Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, An effective., & Rumiati, R. I. (2021). The fresh contribution out-of personality and intelligence to the intellectual competences into the high studies. Frontiers during the Mindset, 12, 2566.
Damian, Roentgen. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, A beneficial., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 taking place 60-six: A good longitudinal study of personality balance and change all over 50 years. Diary off Identification and you may Social Psychology, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, Good. Yards., & Taylor, J. (2022). An investigation of your triarchic make of psychopathy and you will self-reported Group B personality disorder characteristics. Identification Problems: Theory, Browse, and you can Procedures, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, A great., & Monsen, J. (2009). Characteristics and you can intelligence expect informative school grades. Studying and you may individual differences, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Anticipating informative and you will societal–mental outcomes when you look at the emerging adulthood away from intelligence, character, and you can socioeconomic updates. Record out-of Character and you can Societal Psychology.
The netherlands, A. S., & Roisman, Grams. I. (2008). Big Four character traits and you will matchmaking high quality: Self-claimed, observational, and you can physiological proof. Record regarding Societal and private Matchmaking, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, M. (2006). The relationship ranging from cleverness and you will split up. Journal out of Relatives Factors, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology away from Class-B Identification Issues regarding the Five-Grounds Model Angle. Chinese Mental health Diary.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). College or university knowledge and you can non-cognitive skills creativity. Oxford Monetary Documentation, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The brand new impact out-of parents’ and you can spouses’ studies towards the breakup pricing within the Norway. Demographic search, 10, 121-142.
Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. Yards., Haugen, P. M., & Grain, H. B. (1985). Evaluations of bodily attractiveness since the a purpose of many years. This new Diary from Personal Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.
Companion value will get refuse (or not), although it does not be seemingly a shield to matchmaking development
McGue, Yards., Anderson, Age. L., Willoughby, E., Giannelis, An effective., Iacono, W. Grams., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not by g by yourself: Some great benefits of a degree certainly one of those with lower levels off standard cognitive function. Cleverness, ninety-five, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Meters. D., Carter, M. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Is actually social some body much more gorgeous? A no-associate studies regarding agreeableness, extraversion, and you will appeal. Journal from Research inside the Identification, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). This new telecommunications between college or university poverty and you can agreeableness into the anticipating instructional attainment. Identification and Private Differences, 127, 85-88.
Standard attributes from identification and you will affectivity since the predictors away from pleasure when you look at the romantic relationship: Research off self?and you will mate?ratings
Tatarunaite, Elizabeth., Playle, Roentgen., Bonnet, brightwomen.net Ressources supplГ©mentaires K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Face appeal: an effective longitudinal investigation. American Journal from Orthodontics and you can Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flooding, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and you will Michael Westberry. Incorporated Personal Fool around with Microdata Series, Newest Populace Survey: Type ten.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, Age. S., & ). Things about separation and divorce and you may thoughts off premarital intervention: Implications to own boosting matchmaking training. Pair and Family relations Therapy: Look and practice, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Why do character traits assume divorce case? Several routes compliment of fulfillment. Journal regarding Identity and you may Public Mindset, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. An excellent., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioural hereditary data of one’s Black Triad and Huge 5. Character and you may individual Variations, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. Good., Sellbom, Meters., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, R., … & Wright, Good. G. (2019). Personality for the a beneficial hierarchical make of psychopathology. Clinical Mental Technology, 7(1), 77-92.
The current CPS data cannot tell you should your likelihood of separation is additive. Relationships you’ll indicate blended marriages provides high otherwise lower threats than just the full total dangers of one or two anyone. not, prior research towards the separation and you can knowledge demonstrates that it is (Lyngstad, 2004). The new splitting up exposure for a few PhD proprietors is about fifteen%, consistent with the personal danger of 7-8% to have private PhD holders.
Buss, D. Meters., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The companion changing theory. Identification and you may Individual Differences, 104, 143-149.